12.23.2011

Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA): What It Is, and Why You Should Care. Period.

If SOPA passes, you'll be seeing a whole lot of this.
If you've been following tech blogs or C-SPAN recently, you may have heard about the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA).  Now, depending on how Internet-savvy you are (or aren't), you may not understand a couple of things: if you're terribly Web-savvy, you may not understand why this bill hasn't been laughed off the House floor about 58 times already.  If you're not not Web-savvy, you may not understand why the 'Net is all up in arms about a measly little House bill that claims it will ultimately help stamp out counterfeiting parasites.

So here's what you need to know.

What is SOPA?

The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) is a House bill proposed by Rep. Lamar Smith (R - Texas) and supported by a lot of people -- mainly big corporations who have something to protect.  It is also criticized by a lot of people, mainly the denizens of the Internet, who believe that the bill is too harsh, too restrictive, and too vague to be a viable solution to the "problem" of Internet piracy.

[Read Alexander Howard's article at The Huffington Post: What You Need to Know About the Stop Online Piracy Act in 2012]

SOPA is an attempt to help the U.S. government fight copyright fraud (both online and offline, but the bill specifically deals with the online presence of this fraud) outside of the United States.  At the moment, the government has little power when it comes to copyright fraud happening outside of its jurisdiction, i.e., outside of the United States.

So what SOPA proposes to do is give them the power not to shut down Websites perpetrating copyright fraud (because they will never have that power) but to censor them.  SOPA would allow the government to order censorship of a Website that is known for peddling illegal content, either by ordering the Internet Service Provider (such as Comcast) to block the Website, or by forcing search engines (such as Google and Microsoft Bing) and payment processing companies (such as PayPal) to cut off access.

Who Supports SOPA?

Gizmodo has a list of the companies that support SOPA, and this list includes such household names as Disney, ESPN, Estee Lauder, Marvel Entertainment, L'Oreal, Sony, Scholastic, Tiffany & Co., ABC, CBS, and Comcast. And of course the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) and the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) also support SOPA, since it's right up their alley.

Who Doesn't Support SOPA?

There are a few major anti-SOPA congresspeople, including Representative Zoe Lofgren (D - California), who represents a major part of Silicon Valley (she is actually my representative).  Also, Representative Darrell Issa (R - California).  Many large corporations who are more Internet-savvy also do not support SOPA -- TechCrunch has a list of 40 corporations who have come out publicly against SOPA.  These include Facebook, Google, Mozilla, Wikipedia, basically the entire Internet.  The Business Software Alliance initially supported SOPA, but withdrew support after taking another look at the proposed bill.

Why Does Anyone Support SOPA?

If you've read enough about SOPA, you may be wondering why in the world anyone even supports it.  Well, if you take another look at the list of companies that have publicly given the proposed bill support, you'll notice that they're not all MPAA- and RIAA-types -- in fact, many of them have little or nothing to do with tech.  For example, why does Tiffany & Co., or Estee Lauder, or MasterCard even care about a bill about the Internet and piracy?

Because it's not just about piracy -- it's about copyright fraud.  All of these companies (large as they are) are hurt by copyright theft.  For example, if someone purchases a fake Tiffany & Co. necklace from a foreign website, Tiffany & Co. is hurt -- not just because that person might have otherwise purchased a legitimate Tiffany necklace (they might not have -- it's been shown that pirating lots of songs doesn't necessarily mean you'd purchase them at full price, after all), but also because Tiffany can't control its brand quality.  If that necklace tarnishes, then that person (who may still think it's real) will no longer purchase anything from Tiffany, real or not.

Also, if that person discovers that it's not real, they may file a fraud claim with their credit card company.  And well, then MasterCard might end up eating that cost.  And on, and on.

So, while this should  not be read as advocacy for SOPA (because it certainly is not), it is important to realize that the supporters of SOPA aren't just supporting the bill to spite people who download illegal tunes.  Okay, well maybe the RIAA is.


[Read my article at PCWorld: The Case for SOPA]

Why Doesn't Anyone Support SOPA?

If you haven't read all that much about SOPA, you may be wondering why everyone is so angry about it in the first place.  After all, it only applies to foreign websites, and it merely gives the government the power to censor certain websites -- not get rid of them completely.



Perhaps one of the biggest problems with SOPA is the specific wording in the bill.  The bill wants to ban Websites that infringe on others' copyright -- fair enough.  However, because of the way that copyright is set up, this includes multiple websites that have nothing to do with peddling fake TIffany necklaces across the ocean.  For example: YouTube.  Wikipedia.  WikiLeaks, which routinely posts copyrighted documents.  Social networks.  Blogs.  eBay.  In other words, pretty much everything that makes up the Internet.  As Stephen Colbert pointed out in his clip (in which my article was cited!), SOPA would make felons out of kids dancing to a popular song in a YouTube video.

The Colbert ReportMon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Stop Online Piracy Act
www.colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full EpisodesPolitical Humor & Satire BlogVideo Archive

[Read Declan McCullagh's article on CNET: How SOPA Would Affect You: FAQ]


SOPA also makes it a crime to stream copyrighted works without permission -- and allows for a maximum punishment of five years in prison for a first offense of streaming 10 songs or movies within six months.  Yes, five years in prison.


[Read my PCWorld article: Controversial Anti-Piracy Bill (SOPA) Nears House Approval: Why You Should Care]

Basically, the bill goes too far.  As Rep. Zoe Lofgren points out, we don't block telephone lines just because people can do illegal business on them.  We also don't block international flights just because people can hijack them, we don't block shipments just because sometimes they carry drugs, etc.  What's worse is that blocking these websites doesn't even begin to solve or address the issue of actual copyright theft.  After all, it's not like blocking access to these Websites from the United States is going to stop them from existing.  Just because we close our eyes and ears and Internet lines doesn't mean they'll go away.

So what SOPA really does is give the U.S. government the power to censor the Internet on a whim, for no reason.

One Important Thing to Note

While most of the Internet is against SOPA, that does not mean that most of the Internet supports piracy.  In fact, most of the people who are against SOPA are avidly against piracy -- they simply realize that SOPA is much too broad and all-consuming to do much good against piracy, and that it's ripe for abuse by the government.  However, this is a note to both the anti-SOPA laypeople who think they're arguing for "freedom" as in "free stuff" and to the pro-SOPA RIAA and co., who automatically assume that not cracking down with a vengeance on Internet pirates = rampant support for piracy.  Both of you are wrong.

What Can I Do?

SOPA will be re-addressed when the House reconvenes after the winter break.  It's imperative that people who use and understand the Internet speak up.  Here are some things you can do:

Petitions
The Whitehouse Official "We The People" Page: Veto SOPA
SaveTheInternet.com
Save The Internet! (Avaaz)
Don't Censor the Net (Senator Rand Paul's Petition)

Resources
Stop American Censorship (Call Your Congressperson)
Keep the Web OPEN
Fight the Blacklist: A Toolkit for Anti-SOPA Activism (EFF)

12.04.2011

1/4 Century

So my birthday was on Friday. Spoiler alert: I'm 25 years old.  Still in my early twenties though...I don't think you really reach mid-twenties until you're 27.

Lisa, me, and Sylvia (all ASIJ '05 grads). Sylvia works at Facebook, but I like her anyway :)

What's cool is that some of my high school friends are in the Bay Area (that wouldn't be weird, except I went to high school in Tokyo). So we went out because my best friend, Lisa, also just turned 25...on December 1.  Yeah, she's one day older than me (less if you consider the fact that she was born in Ann Arbor and I was born in Tokyo). That's why she's my best friend, obviously.

So Happy Birthday, Lisa!

12.02.2011

I'm on the Colbert Report!

Well, not me, exactly, but my story is.  If you check out the video below, you'll see my story pop up at around the 30 second mark and then again at the 40 second mark.  If you look VERY closely  you can see my name!  On TV!  Haha, sorry...I thought it was cool.  Anyway, check it out:

The Colbert ReportMon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Stop Online Piracy Act
www.colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full EpisodesPolitical Humor & Satire BlogVideo Archive

12.01.2011

Game I'm Obsessed With: DragonVale


DragonVale

As you may or may not know, I write iOS game reviews for both Macworld and GamePro.  Okay, well GamePro is now gone so I guess I write for PCWorld.

Anyway, that means that I end up playing a lot of games -- both good and bad, popular and unpopular, simple and complex.

My most recent iOS obsession is Backflip Studio's real-time "FarmVille"-like game, DragonVale.

Despite the fact that DragonVale is buggy -- it crashes often and is very slow to load -- I love it.  There are a few different reasons that I'm enamored with it, including a relatively simple interface, the fact that though you can make in-app purchases you really don't need to, and the fact that their flagship dragon looks a lot like the Shoyru from Neopets, but one reason really stands out.  And that is: it's the first real-time FarmVille-style game in which you do not need to rush back to your farm (or, in this case, magical floating island) to harvest your crops (or, in this case, collect cash from your dragon displays) once they're finished growing (accumulating money).

This is a Shoyru.
Not from DragonVale...
Finally, a FarmVille-like game that doesn't feel like a ball-and-chain after five days.

Anyway, a little bit about DragonVale.  It's a simple premise -- you run a dragon zoo with different dragons on display.  You can purchase habitats, dragon eggs, and decorations for your zoo.  Each dragon accumulates cash as time goes by (higher-level dragons mean more cash), but each habitat has a maximum amount of cash it can accumulate before you must collect it.

So, unlike FarmVille, in which you must come back to your farm at a certain time to harvest your crops or risk losing the crop, in DragonVale you must come back to your zoo to collect cash once you reach the maximum.  However, if you don't make it back in time, your cash doesn't disappear -- you just can't accumulate any more of it until you've collected your cash.

This is perhaps the main reason I enjoy DragonVale -- I am vaguely interested in social gaming, but I absolutely hate how the -Ville games take over your life.  I remember back when I was reviewing Office Heroes, my biggest issue was that I'd be casually checking my email while driving (not that I make a habit of using my phone while driving), and suddenly I'd get this SUPER URGENT POP-UP NOTIFICATION that was all like, "OMG GO TO THIS GAME AND COLLECT YOUR MONEY RIGHT NOW OR IT WILL DISAPPEAR FOREVER!!!!"  Okay, so the notification said something more along the lines of, "Your order is about to expire," but in my head it definitely read as the former.


There's more to DragonVale than just collecting money, though -- your ultimate goal is to nab every different breed of dragon.  Basic dragons can be purchased in the store using the game's first form of currency, cash.  Rarer dragons can be purchased using the game's second form of currency, gems -- of course, the second form of currency can only be accumulated by receiving gifts (from your many DragonVale friends) or by purchase (er, yeah...using real-world $$).  However, rare dragons can also be bred in the Dragon LoveShack (okay, so it's actually called a breeding cave, or something).  I'm glad that all of the dragons -- rare or not -- are attainable for free, and not for "free" as in "you can get them for free if you spend 1,677,344 hours playing the game".  Rather, breeding dragons takes a little more work and time, but it's not absurd.

So yeah, my only real issue with DragonVale is that it's rather slow and buggy, a fact that can frustrate even the most patient of players.