Zerg Rush!

This is a Zergling. OMG look at how cute it is!

Okay -- so if you haven't heard of Google's latest Easter Egg, you just might be living under a rock.  After all, I just spent my Friday running around the Los Angeles fashion district (the last Friday of every month is when they have all the sample sales), and I know about it.

Basically, type "zerg rush" (without the quotation marks) into Google, and your search results will be overtaken by red and yellow Google o's.  The o's come from all directions and go at each search result, taking it down slowly, the way that Zerglings take down buildings in StarCraft.  Yeah, it's a StarCraft reference -- that Google, full of nerdy gamers.

"Zerg rush" refers to a Zergling rush, which is basically when a StarCraft opponent sends waves of low-level Zerglings to attack your structures.  The point is that there are so many of them that they're hard to defend against, even though they're not very strong individually.

Google emailed the following statement to the Los Angeles Times:

"For n00bs who aren't as familiar with real-time strategy games, there's been a zerg rush on your search results page. Because there should always be time to practice your gaming skills, click on the zerg units to defend the results page and try not to get pwned. Then you can share you APM score onGoogle+. GLHF!"

Anyway, in Google's Easter Egg you can use your mouse to shoot the o's, and when they finish demolishing your search results (they keep coming until they do), you get a score with your APM (Actions Per Minute) and the number of o's you took down.  The o's form into a GG (Good Game), and you can share your score via Google+.  Because, you know, Google+ is a real social network these days.

Anyway, I thought it was cute!  Then Ron asked me what "GG" stood for, and when I told him it was for "Good Game," he paused and said, "Oh...I thought it might have meant Gucci."

Boys these days.

Maxim Gamer Girl

I can't decide if I'm proud of this, but I registered so I plan to win.  Go vote for me to become Maxim's Gamer Girl!

Seriously, do it.  I signed up because I got kicked off the Diablo III servers like eight times in a row.

P.S. the open beta is...open right now, but you may get kicked off the servers.  It's worth it, but don't say I didn't warn you.

Black Boxes in Cars: Ripe for Abuse?

The Senate has just passed a bill that will require all new cars to have aircraft-style "black box" event data recorders placed in them.  Some people think this is an invasion of privacy, while others think it's just the times -- they are a-changin'.

Though the bill stipulates that the data on the black box is the property of the vehicle's owner, it also notes that the data can be retrieved by people who are not the owner under certain circumstances.  For example, if a court orders it.

Now this...is more of an issue than you might think.  You might be thinking, wow, that's great, now we will be able to really determine who is driving unsafely and/or who's to blame for accidents, but that's not really true.  For one thing, there are several situations that I can think of, just off the top of my head, in which one car's black box data will indicate "unsafe" driving, and the other car's black box data will indicate "safe" driving -- but actually, the "unsafe" driver will be the safer driver and vice versa.

For example: One car is speeding slightly (say <5mph over the limit) and the other car runs a stop sign or a red light, and they get into an accident.  The first car's black box shows the speeding ("unsafe"), but the black box in the second car shows nothing.

Another example: One car is tailgating, and the other car is braking to try to wake-up the tailgater (and then speeding up to try to lose the tailgater).  The first car's black box shows nothing, but the second car's black box shows "unsafe" driving.

Now, I realize that there are some situations in which the black box will help determine who actually caused the accident.  The problem is that the data is likely to be one-sided much of the time -- and that one-sided data will likely be misinterpreted to benefit insurance companies.  Sorry, but that should be obvious.  Even if an insurance company isn't involved (not sure why they wouldn't be, but hey), it's really hard for anyone to see hard data and then imagine that there might be another side of the story.  So you can see why this situation could be ripe for abuse, misinterpretation, and why it might not make vehicles "safer," as the government imagines.

Obviously, black boxes in aircraft are a different story.  Sky traffic isn't quite rush hour in NYC, so problems that arise in the air are usually solely related to the plane.

There are, of course, other questions that the bill doesn't address.  For example, are there penalties if you take the black box out of your car, or disable it?  There are penalties for not installing the box, but can you after-market mod your car and get rid of it?  How will the government ensure that your black box data won't be hacked or retrieved without your permission/a court order?  Password protection?  Some other type of security?

My Little Bro Does CrossFit

So...this is my little brother Timmy doing the CrossFit FRAN workout.  His time is 2:17.  That means...he is a champion!  Which is good, because I only accept champion status.